[X] Close
You are about to erase all the values you have customized, search history, page format, etc.
Click here to RESET all values       Click here to GO BACK without resetting any value
Items 1 to 9 of about 9
1. Aldrighetti L, Arru M, Ronzoni M, Salvioni M, Villa E, Ferla G: Extrahepatic biliary stenoses after hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of floxuridine (FUdR) for liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Hepatogastroenterology; 2001 Sep-Oct;48(41):1302-7
PDF icon [Fulltext service] Get downloadable fulltext PDFs of articles closely matching to this article, as many as you want.

  • [Source] The source of this record is MEDLINE®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.
  • [Title] Extrahepatic biliary stenoses after hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of floxuridine (FUdR) for liver metastases from colorectal cancer.
  • Hepatic arterial infusion of floxuridine is an effective treatment for unresectable hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer.
  • Despite its pharmacological advantage of higher tumor drug concentration with minimal systemic toxicity, hepatic arterial infusion of floxuridine is characterized by regional toxicity, including hepatobiliary damage resembling idiopathic sclerosing cholangitis (5-29% of treated cases).
  • Unlike previous reports describing biliary damage of both intrahepatic and extrahepatic ducts, a case series of extrahepatic biliary stenosis after hepatic arterial infusion with floxuridine is herein described.
  • Between September 1993 and February 1999, 54 patients received intraarterial hepatic chemotherapy based on continuous infusion of floxuridine (dose escalation 0.15-0.30 mg/kg/day for 14 days every 28 days) plus dexamethasone 28 mg.
  • Five patients (9.2%) developed biliary toxicity with jaundice and cholangitis (3 cases), alterations of liver function tests and radiological features of biliary tract abnormalities.
  • They received from 9 to 19 cycles (mean 14.5 +/- 6.3 cycles) of floxuridine infusion with a total drug delivered dose ranging from 20.3 to 41.02 mg/kg (mean: 31.4 +/- 13.5 mg/kg).
  • Extrahepatic biliary sclerosis was discovered by computed tomography scan and ultrasound, followed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and/or percutaneous cholangiography in 3 cases.
  • Radiological findings included common hepatic duct complete obstruction in 1 case, common hepatic duct stenosis in 2 cases, common bile duct obstruction in 1 case, and intrahepatic bile ducts dilation without a well-recognized obstruction in 1 case.
  • Two patients were treated by sequentially percutaneous biliary drainage and balloon dilation while 1 patient had an endoscopic transpapillary biliary prosthesis placed.
  • The present series suggests that in some patients receiving hepatic arterial infusion of floxuridine extrahepatic biliary stenosis may represent the primary event leading to a secondary intrahepatic biliary damage that does not correlate with specific floxuridine toxicity but results from bile stasis and infection, recurrent cholangitis and eventually biliary sclerosis.
  • Aggressive research for extrahepatic biliary sclerosis is advised, since an early nonsurgical treatment of extrahepatic biliary stenosis may prevent an irreversible intrahepatic biliary sclerosis worsening the prognosis of metastatic liver disease.
  • [MeSH-major] Adenocarcinoma / secondary. Cholestasis, Extrahepatic / chemically induced. Colorectal Neoplasms / drug therapy. Floxuridine / adverse effects. Infusions, Intra-Arterial. Liver Neoplasms / secondary
  • [MeSH-minor] Aged. Cholangiography. Cholangitis, Sclerosing / chemically induced. Cholangitis, Sclerosing / diagnosis. Cholangitis, Sclerosing / therapy. Dose-Response Relationship, Drug. Female. Follow-Up Studies. Humans. Liver Function Tests. Male. Middle Aged. Stents


2. Mastoraki A, Papanikolaou IS, Konstandiadou I, Sakorafas G, Safioleas M: Facing the challenge of treating gallbladder carcinoma. Review of the literature. Hepatogastroenterology; 2010 Mar-Apr;57(98):215-9
PDF icon [Fulltext service] Get downloadable fulltext PDFs of articles closely matching to this article, as many as you want.

  • [Source] The source of this record is MEDLINE®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.
  • Gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) remains the most common biliary tract malignancy and is characterized as an aggressive and highly lethal disease.
  • There is also a wide discrepancy among sources regarding the epidemiology of the tumor.
  • Despite recent research on the therapeutic strategies against gallbladder neoplastic disorders, surgical resection appears the only potentially curative approach.
  • In addition, surgical removal of gallbladder tumor does not necessarily guarantee patient's long-term recovery.
  • Alternative therapies, such as radio and chemotherapy proved insufficient.
  • The aim of this review was to evaluate the results of surgical treatment for GBC with special reference to the extent of its histological spread and to present the recent literature in order to provide an update on the current concepts of surgical management of the disease.
  • [MeSH-major] Gallbladder Neoplasms / surgery
  • [MeSH-minor] Humans. Neoplasm Staging. Prognosis

  • MedlinePlus Health Information. consumer health - Gallbladder Cancer.
  • [Email] Email this result item
    Email the results to the following email address:   [X] Close
  • (PMID = 20583415.001).
  • [ISSN] 0172-6390
  • [Journal-full-title] Hepato-gastroenterology
  • [ISO-abbreviation] Hepatogastroenterology
  • [Language] eng
  • [Publication-type] Journal Article; Review
  • [Publication-country] Greece
  • [Number-of-references] 34
  •  go-up   go-down


3. Kaiho T, Tanaka T, Tsuchiya S, Yanagisawa S, Takeuchi O, Miura M, Saigusa N, Hayasaka A, Matsuzaki O, Miyazaki M: A case of small cell carcinoma of the common bile duct. Hepatogastroenterology; 2005 Mar-Apr;52(62):363-7
PDF icon [Fulltext service] Get downloadable fulltext PDFs of articles closely matching to this article, as many as you want.

  • [Source] The source of this record is MEDLINE®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.
  • [Title] A case of small cell carcinoma of the common bile duct.
  • Small cell carcinoma occasionally occurs in the gastrointestinal tract, but rarely in the biliary tract.
  • We report a case of small cell carcinoma which occurred in the common bile duct.
  • Computed tomography and ultrasonography showed a mass near the pancreas head and dilatation of the intrahepatic bile ducts.
  • Endoscopic nasobiliary drainage was undertaken, and it revealed obstruction of the common bile duct.
  • The patient was diagnosed preoperatively as having extrahepatic bile duct cancer.
  • Upon laparotomy, a tumor was found to be located in the middle common bile duct.
  • The main trunk of the portal vein and the right hepatic artery were resected concomitantly because of tumor involvement.
  • Postoperative pathological examination revealed well-differentiated papillary adenocarcinoma on the surface of the bile duct lumen, but a large part of the extraductal component was small cell carcinoma.
  • The patient then underwent two postoperative courses of systemic chemotherapy.
  • Nevertheless, she died of cancer recurrence eight months after the operation, which showed that the tumor had a highly lethal nature, with rapid and widespread dissemination.
  • Further therapeutic trials are needed to improve survival in such cases.
  • [MeSH-major] Bile Duct Neoplasms / diagnosis. Carcinoma, Small Cell / diagnosis. Common Bile Duct
  • [MeSH-minor] Aged. Chemotherapy, Adjuvant. Cholangiopancreatography, Magnetic Resonance. Fatal Outcome. Female. Humans. Neoplasm Recurrence, Local. Pancreaticoduodenectomy / methods. Tomography, X-Ray Computed. Ultrasonography

  • MedlinePlus Health Information. consumer health - Bile Duct Cancer.
  • NCI CPTC Antibody Characterization Program. NCI CPTC Antibody Characterization Program .
  • [Email] Email this result item
    Email the results to the following email address:   [X] Close
  • (PMID = 15816436.001).
  • [ISSN] 0172-6390
  • [Journal-full-title] Hepato-gastroenterology
  • [ISO-abbreviation] Hepatogastroenterology
  • [Language] eng
  • [Publication-type] Case Reports; Journal Article
  • [Publication-country] Greece
  •  go-up   go-down


Advertisement
4. Nuzzo G, Giuliante F, Ardito F, Vellone M, Pozzo C, Cassano A, Giovannini I, Barone C: Liver resection for primarily unresectable colorectal metastases downsized by chemotherapy. J Gastrointest Surg; 2007 Mar;11(3):318-24
PDF icon [Fulltext service] Get downloadable fulltext PDFs of articles closely matching to this article, as many as you want.

  • [Source] The source of this record is MEDLINE®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.
  • [Title] Liver resection for primarily unresectable colorectal metastases downsized by chemotherapy.
  • This study was performed prospectively to assess the effect of systemic chemotherapy (FOLFIRI protocol) in patients with initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) and, after performing liver resection in patients with downsized metastases, to compare the postoperative and long-term results with those of patients with primarily resectable CRLM.
  • The analysis addressed all patients who underwent hepatectomy for primarily resectable CRLM (Group A), or underwent chemotherapy for primarily unresectable CRLM and among these, particularly the patients who were finally resected after downsizing of CRLM (Group B).
  • Forty-two other patients underwent chemotherapy; after an average of nine courses, 18 of them (42.8%) with significantly downsized lesions were explored and 15 (35.7%, Group B) were resected, whereas three had peritoneal metastases.
  • Group B differed from Group A for a significantly higher rate of synchronous CRLM upon diagnosis of colorectal cancer, a larger size of CRLM upon evaluation in our center, and a lower rate of major hepatectomies (20.0% vs. 51.6 %) at surgery.
  • ), disease-free survival rate was 31% vs. 58% (p = 0.04) and, at a median follow-up of 34 months, tumor recurrence rate was 53.3% vs. 28.3% (n.s.).
  • These results show that in about one-third of the patients with primarily unresectable CRLM, downsizing of the lesions by chemotherapy (FOLFIRI protocol) permitted a subsequent curative resection.
  • In these patients, operative risk and survival did not differ from the figures observed in primarily resectable patients and, in spite of a lower disease-free survival with more frequent recurrence, re-resection still represented a valid option to continue treatment.
  • [MeSH-major] Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / therapeutic use. Colorectal Neoplasms / pathology. Hepatectomy. Liver Neoplasms / drug therapy. Liver Neoplasms / secondary
  • [MeSH-minor] Adult. Aged. Aged, 80 and over. Camptothecin / analogs & derivatives. Camptothecin / therapeutic use. Combined Modality Therapy. Female. Fluorouracil / therapeutic use. Humans. Leucovorin / therapeutic use. Male. Middle Aged. Postoperative Complications

  • MedlinePlus Health Information. consumer health - Colorectal Cancer.
  • MedlinePlus Health Information. consumer health - Liver Cancer.
  • Hazardous Substances Data Bank. FLUOROURACIL .
  • Hazardous Substances Data Bank. LEUCOVORIN .
  • [Email] Email this result item
    Email the results to the following email address:   [X] Close
  • [Cites] Lancet. 1994 Jun 4;343(8910):1405-10 [7515134.001]
  • [Cites] CA Cancer J Clin. 1999 Jul-Aug;49(4):231-55 [11198884.001]
  • [Cites] Ann Surg. 1997 Jan;225(1):39-8; discussion 48-50 [8998119.001]
  • [Cites] Ann Oncol. 2003;14 Suppl 2:ii13-6 [12810452.001]
  • [Cites] J Clin Oncol. 2000 Jan;18(1):136-47 [10623704.001]
  • [Cites] Lancet. 1997 Sep 6;350(9079):681-6 [9291901.001]
  • [Cites] Ann Surg. 2000 Dec;232(6):777-85 [11088072.001]
  • [Cites] Scand J Gastroenterol. 1975;10(2):221-3 [1124358.001]
  • [Cites] Cancer. 2002 Dec 1;95(11):2283-92 [12436433.001]
  • [Cites] Br J Surg. 1997 Jul;84(7):977-80 [9240140.001]
  • [Cites] Ann Surg. 1989 Aug;210(2):127-38 [2667471.001]
  • [Cites] BMJ. 2000 Sep 30;321(7264):805-8 [11009523.001]
  • [Cites] Ann Surg. 2000 Apr;231(4):480-6 [10749607.001]
  • [Cites] Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2001 Mar;83(2):85-8 [11320935.001]
  • [Cites] Acta Chir Hung. 1997;36(1-4):106-7 [9408305.001]
  • [Cites] Cancer. 1992 Feb 15;69(4):893-900 [1735081.001]
  • [Cites] J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jan 15;22(2):229-37 [14657227.001]
  • [Cites] Am J Surg. 2001 Mar;181(3):238-46 [11376579.001]
  • [Cites] N Engl J Med. 2000 Sep 28;343 (13):905-14 [11006366.001]
  • [Cites] Br J Surg. 1993 Mar;80(3):274-6 [8472130.001]
  • [Cites] J Clin Oncol. 1988 Mar;6(3):469-75 [3280741.001]
  • [Cites] Surgery. 2002 Mar;131(3):294-9 [11894034.001]
  • [Cites] Dig Surg. 2003;20(6):481-96 [13679642.001]
  • [Cites] Lancet. 2000 Mar 25;355(9209):1041-7 [10744089.001]
  • [Cites] Liver Transpl. 2004 Feb;10(2 Suppl 1):S53-7 [14762840.001]
  • [Cites] Ann Surg. 2004 Dec;240(6):1037-49; discussion 1049-51 [15570209.001]
  • [Cites] Ann Surg. 2003 Dec;238(6):871-83; discussion 883-4 [14631224.001]
  • [Cites] Ann Oncol. 1999 Jun;10(6):663-9 [10442188.001]
  • [Cites] Surg Clin North Am. 2004 Apr;84(2):659-71 [15062667.001]
  • [Cites] J Clin Oncol. 2000 Aug;18(16):2938-47 [10944126.001]
  • [Cites] Ann Surg. 1996 Oct;224(4):509-20; discussion 520-2 [8857855.001]
  • [Cites] Ann Surg. 2004 Oct;240(4):644-57; discussion 657-8 [15383792.001]
  • [Cites] World J Surg. 1995 Jan-Feb;19(1):59-71 [7740812.001]
  • [Cites] Ann Oncol. 2004 Jun;15(6):933-9 [15151951.001]
  • [Cites] Cancer. 1993 Jun 15;71(12 Suppl):4252-66 [8508388.001]
  • [Cites] Ann Surg Oncol. 2001 May;8(4):347-53 [11352309.001]
  • [Cites] Ann Surg. 1999 Sep;230(3):309-18; discussion 318-21 [10493478.001]
  • [Cites] Ann Surg. 2004 Jun;239(6):818-25; discussion 825-7 [15166961.001]
  • [Cites] Ann Surg. 1984 May;199(5):502-8 [6721600.001]
  • (PMID = 17458605.001).
  • [ISSN] 1091-255X
  • [Journal-full-title] Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract
  • [ISO-abbreviation] J. Gastrointest. Surg.
  • [Language] eng
  • [Publication-type] Journal Article
  • [Publication-country] United States
  • [Chemical-registry-number] Q573I9DVLP / Leucovorin; U3P01618RT / Fluorouracil; XT3Z54Z28A / Camptothecin; IFL protocol
  •  go-up   go-down


5. Saisho T, Okusaka T, Ueno H, Morizane C, Okada S: Prognostic factors in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer receiving chemotherapy. Hepatogastroenterology; 2005 Nov-Dec;52(66):1654-8
PDF icon [Fulltext service] Get downloadable fulltext PDFs of articles closely matching to this article, as many as you want.

  • [Source] The source of this record is MEDLINE®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.
  • [Title] Prognostic factors in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer receiving chemotherapy.
  • BACKGROUND/AIMS: Prognostic factors in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer receiving chemotherapy have not been fully examined.
  • This study investigated prognostic factors in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer receiving chemotherapy.
  • METHODOLOGY: Sixty-five consecutive chemo-naive patients with advanced biliary tract cancer, who received chemotherapy, were analyzed retrospectively to investigate prognostic factors.
  • RESULTS: Median survival time and overall survival rates at 1 and 2 years were 180 days, 21%, and 5%, respectively.
  • The median survival times for these three groups were 246, 152, and 33 days, respectively.
  • CONCLUSIONS: The results may be helpful for predicting life expectancy, determining treatment strategies, and designing future clinical trials in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer.
  • [MeSH-major] Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / therapeutic use. Biliary Tract Neoplasms / drug therapy. Biliary Tract Neoplasms / mortality. Biomarkers, Tumor / analysis. Cause of Death. Palliative Care
  • [MeSH-minor] Adult. Age Factors. Aged. Analysis of Variance. Biopsy, Needle. Dose-Response Relationship, Drug. Drug Administration Schedule. Female. Humans. Immunohistochemistry. Liver Function Tests. Male. Middle Aged. Multivariate Analysis. Neoplasm Staging. Probability. Prognosis. Proportional Hazards Models. Retrospective Studies. Risk Assessment. Sex Factors. Survival Analysis

  • Genetic Alliance. consumer health - Biliary Tract Cancer.
  • MedlinePlus Health Information. consumer health - Palliative Care.
  • [Email] Email this result item
    Email the results to the following email address:   [X] Close
  • (PMID = 16334750.001).
  • [ISSN] 0172-6390
  • [Journal-full-title] Hepato-gastroenterology
  • [ISO-abbreviation] Hepatogastroenterology
  • [Language] eng
  • [Publication-type] Comparative Study; Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • [Publication-country] Greece
  • [Chemical-registry-number] 0 / Biomarkers, Tumor
  •  go-up   go-down


6. Tsukada K, Takada T, Miyazaki M, Miyakawa S, Nagino M, Kondo S, Furuse J, Saito H, Tsuyuguchi T, Kimura F, Yoshitomi H, Nozawa S, Yoshida M, Wada K, Amano H, Miura F, Japanese Association of Biliary Surgery, Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Japan Society of Clinical Oncology: Diagnosis of biliary tract and ampullary carcinomas. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg; 2008;15(1):31-40
PDF icon [Fulltext service] Download fulltext PDF of this article and others, as many as you want.

  • [Source] The source of this record is MEDLINE®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.
  • [Title] Diagnosis of biliary tract and ampullary carcinomas.
  • Diagnostic methods for biliary tract carcinoma and the efficacy of these methods are discussed.
  • Neither definite methods for early diagnosis nor specific markers are available in this disease.
  • When this disease is suspected on the basis of clinical symptoms and risk factors, hemato-biochemical examination and abdominal ultrasonography are performed and, where appropriate, enhanced computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is carried out.
  • Diagnoses of extrahepatic bile duct cancer and ampullary carcinoma are often made based on the presence of obstructive jaundice.
  • Although rare, abdominal pain and pyrexia, as well as abnormal findings of the hepatobiliary system detected by hemato-biochemical examination, serve as a clue to making a diagnosis of these diseases.
  • On the other hand, the early diagnosis of gallbladder cancer is scarcely possible on the basis of clinical symptoms, so when this cancer is found with the onset of abdominal pain and jaundice, it is already advanced at the time of detection, thus making a cure difficult.
  • Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), in particular--one of the methods of enhanced CT--is useful for decision of surgical criteria, because MDCT shows findings such as localization and extension of the tumor, and the presence or absence of remote metastasis.
  • Procedures such as magnetic resonance imaging, endoscopic ultrasonography, bile duct biopsy, and cholangioscopy should be carried out taking into account indications for these procedures in individual patients.
  • However, direct biliary tract imaging is necessary for making a precise diagnosis of the horizontal extension of bile duct cancer.
  • [MeSH-major] Ampulla of Vater. Biliary Tract Neoplasms / diagnosis. Carcinoma / diagnosis
  • [MeSH-minor] Endoscopy, Digestive System. Evidence-Based Medicine / methods. Humans. Magnetic Resonance Imaging / methods. Tomography, X-Ray Computed / methods. Ultrasonography / methods

  • [Email] Email this result item
    Email the results to the following email address:   [X] Close
  • [Cites] Endoscopy. 2006 May;38(5):521-5 [16767591.001]
  • [Cites] J Hepatol. 2006 Jul;45(1):43-50 [16690156.001]
  • [Cites] World J Surg. 2007 Jan;31(1):155-61; discussion 162-3 [17180477.001]
  • [Cites] Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 Oct;66(4):730-6 [17905015.001]
  • [Cites] J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2008;15(1):2-6 [18274838.001]
  • [Cites] Radiology. 2001 Jul;220(1):90-6 [11425978.001]
  • [Cites] AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001 Nov;177(5):1095-100 [11641179.001]
  • [Cites] Radiographics. 2002 Jan-Feb;22(1):173-87 [11796906.001]
  • [Cites] Trop Gastroenterol. 2001 Oct-Dec;22(4):227-9 [11963335.001]
  • [Cites] J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2002 May-Jun;26(3):405-10 [12016370.001]
  • [Cites] AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Aug;179(2):423-8 [12130444.001]
  • [Cites] Eur Radiol. 2002 Aug;12(8):1993-9 [12136317.001]
  • [Cites] Gut. 2002 Nov;51 Suppl 6:VI1-9 [12376491.001]
  • [Cites] Gastrointest Endosc. 2002 Dec;56(6 Suppl):S206-12 [12447269.001]
  • [Cites] J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002 Dec;16(6):676-84 [12451581.001]
  • [Cites] World J Surg. 2003 Mar;27(3):260-5 [12607048.001]
  • [Cites] Lancet Oncol. 2003 Mar;4(3):167-76 [12623362.001]
  • [Cites] J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003 Aug;18(8):950-3 [12859725.001]
  • [Cites] Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Oct;58(4):536-41 [14520286.001]
  • [Cites] Ann Intern Med. 2003 Oct 7;139(7):547-57 [14530225.001]
  • [Cites] Semin Gastrointest Dis. 2003 Oct;14(4):208-21 [14719771.001]
  • [Cites] J Gastrointest Surg. 2004 Jan;8(1):90-7 [14746840.001]
  • [Cites] Oncology (Williston Park). 2004 Jun;18(7):889-96 [15255172.001]
  • [Cites] Radiology. 2004 Oct;233(1):234-40 [15333766.001]
  • [Cites] J Gastroenterol. 2005 Jul;40(7):739-43 [16082591.001]
  • [Cites] Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Sep;62(3):374-82 [16111955.001]
  • [Cites] Lancet. 2005 Oct 8;366(9493):1303-14 [16214602.001]
  • [Cites] Br J Surg. 2000 Jan;87(1):110-5 [10606921.001]
  • [Cites] Am J Gastroenterol. 2000 Jan;95(1):204-7 [10638584.001]
  • [Cites] Gut. 2000 Feb;46(2):250-4 [10644321.001]
  • [Cites] Liver Transpl. 2000 Nov;6(6):786-94 [11084070.001]
  • [Cites] Am J Surg. 2001 Jan;181(1):65-70 [11248179.001]
  • [Cites] Gastrointest Endosc. 2001 Mar;53(3):300-7 [11231387.001]
  • [Cites] Hepatology. 2001 May;33(5):1029-35 [11343227.001]
  • [Cites] J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006 Feb;40(2):162-6 [16394879.001]
  • [Cites] AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Jun;186(6):1580-6 [16714646.001]
  • [Cites] J Surg Oncol. 2006 Jun 15;93(8):665-9 [16724349.001]
  • [Cites] Ann Surg. 1982 May;195(5):624-31 [7073360.001]
  • [Cites] Acta Cytol. 1982 May-Jun;26(3):311-6 [6285653.001]
  • [Cites] Acta Cytol. 1988 Jul-Aug;32(4):475-81 [3400385.001]
  • [Cites] Radiology. 1989 Jul;172(1):35-40 [2544924.001]
  • [Cites] Radiology. 1989 Sep;172(3):689-92 [2549565.001]
  • [Cites] Endoscopy. 1989 Dec;21 Suppl 1:351-6 [2606085.001]
  • [Cites] Surg Clin North Am. 1990 Dec;70(6):1429-47 [2174191.001]
  • [Cites] Gastrointest Endosc. 1990 Nov-Dec;36(6):588-92 [2279648.001]
  • [Cites] J Nucl Med Allied Sci. 1990 Oct-Dec;34(4 Suppl):97-102 [2092159.001]
  • [Cites] Anticancer Res. 1992 Sep-Oct;12(5):1687-93 [1332581.001]
  • [Cites] Endoscopy. 1993 Jan;25(1):76-80 [8384103.001]
  • [Cites] Mayo Clin Proc. 1993 Sep;68(9):874-9 [8396700.001]
  • [Cites] Radiology. 1993 Dec;189(3):875-80 [8234719.001]
  • [Cites] Cancer. 1994 Jun 15;73(12):2922-9 [8199989.001]
  • [Cites] Acta Cytol. 1995 May-Jun;39(3):494-8 [7762339.001]
  • [Cites] Endoscopy. 1995 Oct;27(8):579-83 [8608750.001]
  • [Cites] Radiology. 1996 Mar;198(3):869-73 [8628885.001]
  • [Cites] Hepatogastroenterology. 1996 Jan-Feb;43(7):260-7 [8682475.001]
  • [Cites] Abdom Imaging. 1996 May-Jun;21(3):195-201 [8661547.001]
  • [Cites] Gastrointest Endosc. 1997 Mar;45(3):251-60 [9087831.001]
  • [Cites] Hepatogastroenterology. 1997 Sep-Oct;44(17):1477-83 [9356876.001]
  • [Cites] Gastroenterologist. 1997 Dec;5(4):306-15 [9436006.001]
  • [Cites] Ann Surg. 1998 Mar;227(3):405-11 [9527064.001]
  • [Cites] Arch Surg. 1998 Jul;133(7):735-9 [9688001.001]
  • [Cites] Gastrointest Endosc. 1998 Oct;48(4):406-10 [9786115.001]
  • [Cites] Gastrointest Endosc. 1999 Mar;49(3 Pt 1):349-57 [10049419.001]
  • [Cites] Br J Radiol. 1998 Dec;71(852):1279-82 [10319001.001]
  • [Cites] N Engl J Med. 1999 Jul 22;341(4):258-64 [10413739.001]
  • [Cites] N Engl J Med. 1999 Oct 28;341(18):1368-78 [10536130.001]
  • [Cites] Hepatogastroenterology. 2005 Jan-Feb;52(61):5-7 [15782981.001]
  • [Cites] Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005 Apr 15;21(8):933-48 [15813829.001]
  • [Cites] Gastroenterology. 2005 May;128(6):1655-67 [15887157.001]
  • (PMID = 18274842.001).
  • [ISSN] 0944-1166
  • [Journal-full-title] Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery
  • [ISO-abbreviation] J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg
  • [Language] eng
  • [Publication-type] Journal Article; Practice Guideline; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • [Publication-country] Japan
  • [Other-IDs] NLM/ PMC2794353
  • [Investigator] Kai M; Kimura Y; Sawada S; Shimizu H; Nakagawara H; Nakachi K; Yoshitome H; Saisyo H; Ryu M; Shikata S; Nimura Y
  •  go-up   go-down


7. Tan MC, Linehan DC, Hawkins WG, Siegel BA, Strasberg SM: Chemotherapy-induced normalization of FDG uptake by colorectal liver metastases does not usually indicate complete pathologic response. J Gastrointest Surg; 2007 Sep;11(9):1112-9
PDF icon [Fulltext service] Get downloadable fulltext PDFs of articles closely matching to this article, as many as you want.

  • [Source] The source of this record is MEDLINE®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.
  • [Title] Chemotherapy-induced normalization of FDG uptake by colorectal liver metastases does not usually indicate complete pathologic response.
  • These have been associated with normalization of [(18)F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) uptake (complete metabolic response) on follow-up Positron Emission Tomography with [(18)F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG-PET) scans in some patients.
  • It is unclear how often complete metabolic response is indicative of complete tumor destruction.
  • We analyzed a subset of patients who had neoadjuvant chemotherapy for hepatic metastases from colorectal adenocarcinoma.
  • (1) FDG-avid hepatic lesions before initiation of chemotherapy;.
  • (2) complete metabolic response of the same lesions after chemotherapy; and (3) histopathologic examination of hepatic lesions.
  • Complete pathologic response was defined as no histologically identifiable viable tumor.
  • Seven lesions had complete metabolic response and disappeared on computed tomography (CT); of these, six still contained viable tumor.
  • We conclude that complete metabolic response on FDG-PET after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an unreliable indicator of complete pathologic response.
  • [MeSH-major] Liver Neoplasms / diagnostic imaging. Liver Neoplasms / drug therapy. Positron-Emission Tomography
  • [MeSH-minor] Adult. Aged. Aged, 80 and over. Angiogenesis Inhibitors / therapeutic use. Antibodies, Monoclonal / therapeutic use. Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized. Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / therapeutic use. Bevacizumab. Chemotherapy, Adjuvant. Colorectal Neoplasms / pathology. Drug Therapy, Combination. Female. Fluorouracil / therapeutic use. Glucose-6-Phosphate / analogs & derivatives. Humans. Leucovorin / therapeutic use. Male. Middle Aged. Neoadjuvant Therapy. Organoplatinum Compounds / therapeutic use. Treatment Outcome

  • MedlinePlus Health Information. consumer health - Liver Cancer.
  • COS Scholar Universe. author profiles.
  • Hazardous Substances Data Bank. FLUOROURACIL .
  • Hazardous Substances Data Bank. LEUCOVORIN .
  • [Email] Email this result item
    Email the results to the following email address:   [X] Close
  • [Cites] Lancet. 1994 Jun 4;343(8910):1405-10 [7515134.001]
  • [Cites] Clin Cancer Res. 2005 Apr 15;11(8):2785-808 [15837727.001]
  • [Cites] J Am Coll Surg. 2004 Jul;199(1):1-7 [15217621.001]
  • [Cites] J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 Feb 2;92 (3):205-16 [10655437.001]
  • [Cites] J Nucl Med. 2003 Feb;44(2):224-39 [12571214.001]
  • [Cites] J Clin Oncol. 2006 Aug 20;24(24):3939-45 [16921046.001]
  • [Cites] N Engl J Med. 2004 Jun 3;350(23 ):2335-42 [15175435.001]
  • [Cites] Radiographics. 2003 Mar-Apr;23 (2):315-40; quiz 533 [12640150.001]
  • [Cites] J Nucl Med. 2004 Jan;45(1):56-68 [14734674.001]
  • [Cites] Radiology. 2005 Oct;237(1):123-31 [16100087.001]
  • [Cites] Br J Surg. 1997 Jul;84(7):977-80 [9240140.001]
  • [Cites] J Am Coll Surg. 2005 Jun;200(6):845-53 [15922194.001]
  • [Cites] HPB (Oxford). 2002;4(2):99; author reply 99-100 [18332933.001]
  • [Cites] J Nucl Med. 2005 Jun;46(6):983-95 [15937310.001]
  • [Cites] J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jun 1;23 (16):3697-705 [15738537.001]
  • [Cites] J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jan 15;22(2):229-37 [14657227.001]
  • [Cites] Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2006 Feb;5(1):37-43 [16417400.001]
  • [Cites] Anticancer Res. 2006 Nov-Dec;26(6C):4705-11 [17214330.001]
  • [Cites] Br J Cancer. 2006 Mar 27;94(6):798-805 [16508637.001]
  • [Cites] Ann Surg. 2004 Sep;240(3):438-47; discussion 447-50 [15319715.001]
  • [Cites] Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Oct;78(4):1152-60; discussion 1152-60 [15464463.001]
  • [Cites] J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jan 1;22(1):23-30 [14665611.001]
  • [Cites] Radiology. 2002 Sep;224(3):748-56 [12202709.001]
  • [Cites] Ann Oncol. 2007 Feb;18(2):299-304 [17060484.001]
  • [Cites] J Nucl Med. 2000 Jul;41(7):1177-89 [10914907.001]
  • [Cites] J Clin Oncol. 2005 Dec 1;23 (34):8713-6 [16314631.001]
  • [Cites] J Gastrointest Surg. 2007 Jul;11(7):929-44 [17593417.001]
  • [Cites] World J Surg. 1995 Jan-Feb;19(1):59-71 [7740812.001]
  • [Cites] Ann Oncol. 2006 Sep;17 (9):1399-403 [16873427.001]
  • [Cites] J Clin Oncol. 2004 Mar 1;22(5):900-8 [14990646.001]
  • [Cites] Ann Surg. 1999 Sep;230(3):309-18; discussion 318-21 [10493478.001]
  • (PMID = 17623263.001).
  • [ISSN] 1091-255X
  • [Journal-full-title] Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract
  • [ISO-abbreviation] J. Gastrointest. Surg.
  • [Language] eng
  • [Publication-type] Journal Article
  • [Publication-country] United States
  • [Chemical-registry-number] 0 / Angiogenesis Inhibitors; 0 / Antibodies, Monoclonal; 0 / Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; 0 / Organoplatinum Compounds; 2S9ZZM9Q9V / Bevacizumab; 40871-47-4 / 2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose-6-phosphate; 56-73-5 / Glucose-6-Phosphate; Q573I9DVLP / Leucovorin; U3P01618RT / Fluorouracil; Folfox protocol
  •  go-up   go-down


8. Morine Y, Shimada M, Ikegami T, Imura S, Kanemura H, Arakawa Y, Hanaoka J, Kanamoto M, Nii A: Usefulness of gemcitabine combined with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin (GFP) in patients for unresectable biliary carcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology; 2009 Mar-Apr;56(90):307-12
PDF icon [Fulltext service] Get downloadable fulltext PDFs of articles closely matching to this article, as many as you want.

  • [Source] The source of this record is MEDLINE®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.
  • [Title] Usefulness of gemcitabine combined with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin (GFP) in patients for unresectable biliary carcinoma.
  • BACKGROUND/AIMS: Advanced biliary carcinoma have poor prognosis and chemotherapy has been shown to have little impact.
  • The aim of the present study is to clarify the effectiveness of GEM combined with CDDP and 5FU (GFP) therapy for unresectable biliary carcinoma.
  • METHODOLOGY: Fourteen patients with biliary carcinoma (4 patients; gallbladder cancer, 10 patients; biliary tract) who had no prior chemotherapy were enrolled.
  • A triple combination of agents was administered with a 4-week cycle GFP chemotherapy consisting of GEM at 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and of 5-FU at 250 mg/m2 and CDDP at 3mg/m2 on days 1 to 5.
  • Stable disease was observed in 9 (64.3%) patients.
  • According to the tumor site, overall response rate was 20.0% in biliary tract carcinoma, on the other hand, 25.0% in gallbladder carcinoma.
  • CONCLUSIONS: The significant antitumor activity of GFP chemotherapy has been seen in patients with advanced biliary carcinoma.
  • However, further evaluation in large numbers of patients is needed to determine the difference in chemosensitivity according to the tumor site.
  • [MeSH-major] Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / therapeutic use. Bile Duct Neoplasms / drug therapy. Gallbladder Neoplasms / drug therapy
  • [MeSH-minor] Adult. Aged. Aged, 80 and over. Chi-Square Distribution. Cisplatin / administration & dosage. Cisplatin / adverse effects. Deoxycytidine / administration & dosage. Deoxycytidine / adverse effects. Deoxycytidine / analogs & derivatives. Female. Fluorouracil / administration & dosage. Fluorouracil / adverse effects. Humans. Male. Middle Aged. Statistics, Nonparametric. Survival Rate. Treatment Outcome

  • MedlinePlus Health Information. consumer health - Bile Duct Cancer.
  • MedlinePlus Health Information. consumer health - Gallbladder Cancer.
  • Hazardous Substances Data Bank. CIS-DIAMINEDICHLOROPLATINUM .
  • Hazardous Substances Data Bank. FLUOROURACIL .
  • NCI CPTC Antibody Characterization Program. NCI CPTC Antibody Characterization Program .
  • [Email] Email this result item
    Email the results to the following email address:   [X] Close
  • (PMID = 19579588.001).
  • [ISSN] 0172-6390
  • [Journal-full-title] Hepato-gastroenterology
  • [ISO-abbreviation] Hepatogastroenterology
  • [Language] eng
  • [Publication-type] Journal Article
  • [Publication-country] Greece
  • [Chemical-registry-number] 0W860991D6 / Deoxycytidine; B76N6SBZ8R / gemcitabine; Q20Q21Q62J / Cisplatin; U3P01618RT / Fluorouracil
  •  go-up   go-down


9. Kasuya K, Shimazu M, Suzuki M, Kuroiwa Y, Usuda J, Itoi T, Tsuchida A, Aoki T: Novel photodynamic therapy against biliary tract carcinoma using mono-L: -aspartyl chlorine e6: basic evaluation for its feasibility and efficacy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2010 May;17(3):313-21
PDF icon [Fulltext service] Get downloadable fulltext PDFs of articles closely matching to this article, as many as you want.

  • [Source] The source of this record is MEDLINE®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.
  • [Title] Novel photodynamic therapy against biliary tract carcinoma using mono-L: -aspartyl chlorine e6: basic evaluation for its feasibility and efficacy.
  • BACKGROUND: Recently, a second-generation photosensory agent for photodynamic therapy (PDT), mono-L: -aspartyl chlorine e6 (NPe6), which degrades rapidly in vivo, has been developed.
  • We evaluated its feasibility and efficacy for treatment in biliary tract carcinoma.
  • METHODS: A transmittance of semiconductor laser light (664 nm), sensitivity of a human biliary tract carcinoma cell line, and disorder to normal tissue including Glissonian constructs and adjacent hepatocytes were investigated.
  • RESULTS: The transmittance of the laser was 85-91% through yellow clear bile and that of the bile including 50 microg/ml NPe6 was 17-48%.
  • The NOZ cell-tumor volume was reduced significantly 14 days after irradiation in the PDT group (PDT 69.9 +/- 44.6 mm(3) vs control 296.3 +/- 239.9 mm(3) P < 0.05).
  • No severe hepatic disorder including Glisson components was observed by the histological findings.
  • CONCLUSION: NPe6 PDT was effective in carcinomas even in the presence of bile, and causes no serious complication for the liver and Glisson structure.
  • Therefore, NPe6 PDT will be a useful candidate as a new therapy for biliary tract carcinomas.
  • [MeSH-major] Biliary Tract Neoplasms / drug therapy. Photochemotherapy / methods. Photosensitizing Agents / therapeutic use. Porphyrins / therapeutic use
  • [MeSH-minor] Cell Line, Tumor. Dose-Response Relationship, Drug. Feasibility Studies. Gallbladder Neoplasms / drug therapy. Hepatocytes / drug effects. Humans. Lethal Dose 50

  • [Email] Email this result item
    Email the results to the following email address:   [X] Close
  • (PMID = 20464561.001).
  • [ISSN] 1868-6982
  • [Journal-full-title] Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences
  • [ISO-abbreviation] J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci
  • [Language] eng
  • [Publication-type] Journal Article
  • [Publication-country] Japan
  • [Chemical-registry-number] 0 / Photosensitizing Agents; 0 / Porphyrins; P4ROX5ELT2 / Talaporfin
  •  go-up   go-down






Advertisement